Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, Smok Novo while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various possibilities for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
Most of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, which helps it be hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. It also assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to achieve this.
The author suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from this is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers could be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the unwanted effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have plenty of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past couple of years.
The writer does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who try to quit often do so due to other medical issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are lots of reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it holds true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are located in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we must do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not based in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the amount of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.